Calsolaro's Comments


By DIA, Section News
Posted on Wed Jul 02, 2008 at 05:10:03 AM EST

From Councilman Calsolaro yesterday:
Today's TU's story entitled, "Access to activities limited", is an article about a group of dedicated ctizens trying to identify the root causes of the gangs, guns and drug problem in Albany. The group identified three main causes for these problems: that too many of Albany's children are living in poverty; poverty is a major cause of the gangs, guns and drug problem in Albany; and that while there are many programs for our city's youth, the means of getting to these programs, i.e. transportation, is lacking.

The group called for the city to invest $100,000 in a transportation project that would safely get our youth to, and back home from, the places the programs are held (Lincoln Park, Boys & Girls Club, schools, the city youth centers, etc.). Sounds reasonable to me. Many other cities provide transportation for this purpose, for example: "GOT WHEELS" in Oakland, CA. So what is the reponse to this suggestion: Mayor Jennings takes his usual posture of not saying what the city will do to solve the problem, but deflects the problem onto others and he blames the school district. But, he even goes further this time, and includes the churches in his "pass-the-buck" answer to any problem that affects the city.

The Inner City Youth and Family Coalition, made up of residents, elected officials, representatives of religious organizations, etc., simply asked for the city to find a way to transport our children to summer and after-school programs so as to keep the youth off the streets. But, the Mayor and his commissioners obviously don't get it. Parks and Recreation Commissioner John D'Antonio (and John and I work very well together) speaks about the city's boxing program on Quail Street and the fitness center in Lincoln Park. And that's the point: How are the kids (already living below the poverty line) in West Hill and Arbor Hill going to get to Lincoln Park? Or, how are the kids in the South End going to get to the boxing program on Quail Street? Transportation is the answer.

But Mayor Jennings, who joined a group of us and sat for two hours a couple of weeks ago with representatives from Providence, RI explaining how they put their youth programs/after-school activities under one umbrella and how they provide TRANSPORTATION to and from the different programs, is quoted in the TU, "I am not sure it just boils down to transportation." The Providence project uses school buses at little or no cost by re-working the schedules of some buses to get the kids to the programs. The "Got Wheels" program uses public transporation. These programs are successful. Since "Got Wheels" went into effect, juvenile crime in Oakland dropped 40%. In Providence, school attendance increased, and truancy decreased after their transportation program was enacted.

Mayor, it's time to stop blaming others (the school district, the churches, the parents, etc.) for Albany's problems and start to take actions to solve the problems. It's time to stop hiding behind stoops (see today's TU editorial cartoon) and time to admit we have a gang, gun and drug problem in Albany. It's time to get involved with our youth and provide the means (TRANSPORTATION) to attend the many programs offered to our youth. It's time, as Sister Natalie Runfola said, to stop abandoning our youth!

Dominick Calsolaro
Common Council Member - First Ward

< Giving Kids Opportunities to Make It | Jerry Supporters >

Login

Make a new account

Username:
Password:

Related Links

+ Also by DIA
Display: Sort:
Calsolaro's Comments | 12 comments (12 topical, 0 hidden)
note (none / 0) (#1)
by DIA on Wed Jul 02, 2008 at 05:11:30 AM EST
other politicians are welcome to post here or send their comments.  However, so far, Calsolaro is the only one to bother to join the conversation.

Dominick for Mayor (none / 0) (#2)
by Tom Paine on Wed Jul 02, 2008 at 07:40:04 AM EST
I hope he runs.

[ Parent ]
Seige (none / 0) (#3)
by Roscoe on Wed Jul 02, 2008 at 09:57:54 AM EST

I am neither a politician, nor speaking for any, but here's my take on this:

When I was a kid my brothers and I and our friends wandered all over the City of Albany, on foot or by bike.  All the way out New Scotland to the Normanskill, down to the Palace, to Lincoln Pool, and even out Central to look at cars.  Older kids supervised younger, and if they didn't there'd be hell to pay.  Our parents always knew where we were and what we were doing, if they weren't immediately nearby.  Parents talked to and helped other parents, and strangers would help a lost kid get home. Older members of the extended network of family and friends assumed quasi-parental roles.  Albany was a safe city for families and kids.

After the Projects were built in the South End, particularly those by Lincoln Park, that part of the city became off limits.  It is probably foolhardy to put lots of unsupervised kids of similar situation in one place and believe they won't take it over and identify it as their turf, and defend it to the extent and limitation of their juvenile ability to reason.  This housing pattern has been replicated successively, by governmental largess and stupidity, to several sections of the city, and the consequence is what we see in the papers.  The consequence is amplified and made violent by the relentless destruction of the family by the Social Democrats in search of a patronage-plus easy fix outside of the moral and cultural constraints of family.  Acknowledgement of the value, competence, and potential of each human being, and the social validation of the inherent human ability to reason and do the right thing, whatever the circumstances, is a central cultural rule, but not for the Democratic Party.

I do not doubt that the destruction of the family, and the role of fathers, by the corrosive culture of the Welfare State, is the predominant cause of what is going on in Albany, and around the country.  We have allowed the Plantation Politics of the Democratic Party to destroy our cities, and the lives of our neighbors.

Are there sufficient able men and women in the challenged sections of the city to identify and take the children of their community, as necessary, these short distances to safe and constructive activity each day? If so (and I believe -- know -- that there are), do it.  In the process you will find out which kids resist constructive and structured activity, and that is useful information.

If there are no adults left, then no $100,000 transportation program will change a damn thing.

Something to ponder (none / 0) (#5)
by TerryONeillEsq on Wed Jul 02, 2008 at 03:01:18 PM EST
Proofs And The Pudding (none / 0) (#9)
by Roscoe on Thu Jul 03, 2008 at 06:31:49 AM EST

Isn't it wonderful, Layman, that you and I have this forum to exchange and work upon our ideas?  I hope you understand that I target your posts as a starting point for mine, on occasion, not on a personal or petty level, but, I hope (again), on an ideational level.

First, your misuse of the word "ideology":  such a wonderful starting point from which to segue to bullshit, but not otherwise useful, in my opinion.  I have previously posted the definition of this word, for your benefit and the benefit of others, so I shall not repeat myself.  Understand this however, Layman:  Western Civilization is not an ideology.   Your beery/stoner post-Marxist professor might have been an ideologue, but I am not.  I posted plenty of facts at the beginning of my opinion, supra, which anyone of my generation in this city, and there are still a lot of us, could validate with his or her own experience. Obviously you discounted them, and therefore, to you they are not facts.  So who then is the ideologue?  As my late sainted parents would say, LOOK IT UP, FIGURE IT OUT.

I will not, as has heretofore been your wont, comment on your use of the word "wanking", other than to note that a Freudian ideologue might find it interesting.

O'NEIL: Thanks for that link to The Atlantic article.  I had not read it.  Now I have.  It appears that the worm perhaps is beginning to turn. I pray that there are enough of good and stout heart to rebuild from this post-liberal wreckage.

ALBERTM:  Yes, there is a huge body of information out there, easy to find, helpful to all of us. It is hard to get it past the filters installed by stupid educators and stupider media-types.   Also I agree, Byrd's a turd.    

[ Parent ]

Roscoe (none / 0) (#4)
by albany layman on Wed Jul 02, 2008 at 10:47:15 AM EST
I disagree with most of what you wrote, but since you didn't provide any quotes, or facts, or evidence, it's very difficult to respond.  I could reply to your ideology with my own ideology, but let's face it - that would just be a bunch of wanking which would serve no purpose.

I will just say this.  Money for transportation to youth programs would not be a cure-all.  It would not suddenly solve all of our problems.  It is a simple proposal that could help a few kids.  Then, next year, maybe a few more kids, and the year after even more.  If we don't try a simple proposal like this, to make whatever difference we can for the kids of our city - what the hell is wrong with us.

Don't dismiss him (none / 0) (#6)
by AlfredMoisiu on Wed Jul 02, 2008 at 03:23:18 PM EST
Check out the classic book "The Death and Life of American Cities" by Jane Jacobs.

One part of the book looks at the differences between the pre-urban renewal tenement communities and the post-urban renewal nightmares that started emerging in the 50's and 60's.

Basically, government intervention in housing destroyed neighborhood cohesion, and turned poor communities into warehouses full of isolated poor people.

Do some research into Robert Byrd's role in the implementation of public assistance as well. Thanks to that jackass Senator, the notion of an urban two-parent black family became nearly a myth in less than a decade.


[ Parent ]

Think it might be just a bit more complex? (none / 0) (#7)
by Tom Paine on Thu Jul 03, 2008 at 05:36:37 AM EST
You really think one senator destroyed family structures in a decade?

[ Parent ]
I'm more than willing (none / 0) (#8)
by albany layman on Thu Jul 03, 2008 at 06:06:21 AM EST
to discuss ideology and academic studies of urban planning.

After we fund this transportation to community centers policy.  Not before.

Classic (none / 0) (#12)
by AlfredMoisiu on Thu Jul 03, 2008 at 03:14:09 PM EST
"The children" are so important, we must act!

Please. I have no problem lobbying CDTA to adjust or create bus routes that could potentially improve access to public facilities for everyone. Not creating some dedicated shuttle service that nobody will use.

More stupid things have been done in the name of "the children" than anything else in this country. How many of these kids are we already providing free food, healthcare, housing subsidies and income to? Enough.

[ Parent ]

Roscoe (none / 0) (#10)
by albany layman on Thu Jul 03, 2008 at 07:20:19 AM EST
Hey, let's hear it for Roscoe, everybody!  He knows big wurds!

* golf clap *

I did not realize that your subjective experiences = facts.  How silly of me.  I will have to reconsider your entire comment!  Or, you know, not.

Layman (none / 0) (#11)
by Roscoe on Thu Jul 03, 2008 at 01:36:20 PM EST

Layman, "subjective" is not a word to apply in this instance, so I guess you can look that up too, or not.

Good to see you learnt your lessons so well.

Calsolaro's Comments | 12 comments (12 topical, 0 hidden)
Display: Sort:
create account | faq | search