I am neither a politician, nor speaking for any, but here's my take on this:
When I was a kid my brothers and I and our friends wandered all over the City of Albany, on foot or by bike. All the way out New Scotland to the Normanskill, down to the Palace, to Lincoln Pool, and even out Central to look at cars. Older kids supervised younger, and if they didn't there'd be hell to pay. Our parents always knew where we were and what we were doing, if they weren't immediately nearby. Parents talked to and helped other parents, and strangers would help a lost kid get home. Older members of the extended network of family and friends assumed quasi-parental roles. Albany was a safe city for families and kids.
After the Projects were built in the South End, particularly those by Lincoln Park, that part of the city became off limits. It is probably foolhardy to put lots of unsupervised kids of similar situation in one place and believe they won't take it over and identify it as their turf, and defend it to the extent and limitation of their juvenile ability to reason. This housing pattern has been replicated successively, by governmental largess and stupidity, to several sections of the city, and the consequence is what we see in the papers. The consequence is amplified and made violent by the relentless destruction of the family by the Social Democrats in search of a patronage-plus easy fix outside of the moral and cultural constraints of family. Acknowledgement of the value, competence, and potential of each human being, and the social validation of the inherent human ability to reason and do the right thing, whatever the circumstances, is a central cultural rule, but not for the Democratic Party.
I do not doubt that the destruction of the family, and the role of fathers, by the corrosive culture of the Welfare State, is the predominant cause of what is going on in Albany, and around the country. We have allowed the Plantation Politics of the Democratic Party to destroy our cities, and the lives of our neighbors.
Are there sufficient able men and women in the challenged sections of the city to identify and take the children of their community, as necessary, these short distances to safe and constructive activity each day? If so (and I believe -- know -- that there are), do it. In the process you will find out which kids resist constructive and structured activity, and that is useful information.
If there are no adults left, then no $100,000 transportation program will change a damn thing.