Retired Vice Admiral Joe Sestak Talks Sense


By DIA, Section News
Posted on Sat Aug 19, 2006 at 01:12:50 PM EST

Want to feel safer? Vote for Democrats like Joe Sestak.
For the cost of two days in Iraq we could screen 100% of all air cargo on passenger planes.

Incredibly, ten years after al Qaeda plotted to bring liquid explosives onto planes, our airports are still not equipped to detect them.

With what we spend in 5 days in Iraq, we could ensure that all of the cargo entering our ports is screened for dangerous radioactive weapons.

The status quo is unacceptable. We must do better

< Sweeney and Chartock | Citizens vs. The Media >

Login

Make a new account

Username:
Password:
Display: Sort:
Retired Vice Admiral Joe Sestak Talks Sense | 5 comments (5 topical, 0 hidden)
whats wrong with this picture (none / 0) (#1)
by alfrednewman on Sat Aug 19, 2006 at 01:31:54 PM EST
National Radio  Address
"Democrats Will Keep  America Secure"

Hello. My name is Joe Sestak of Pennsylvania; I am a former 3-star Vice Admiral who spent 31 years serving my country in our Navy -  they were the proudest years of my life. Today, I'd like to talk to you about a topic that's too important for partisan politics: a new direction for America's security.

Damn straight, this is too important for partisan politics. Lets go straight to the military dictatorship Mr Vice Admiral. Stage the coup now.

"Democrats will keep us secure" is full of as much garbage as the Albany landfill and is as hypocritical as the designating the center on an on ramp a nature preserve.

Would anyone really like to discuss William Jefferson Clinton's military spending and foreign policy adventures?
"What? Me worry? " "whatmeworry.alfred@gmail.com"

This is also funny. So much for Democracy (none / 0) (#2)
by alfrednewman on Sat Aug 19, 2006 at 01:39:50 PM EST
DEMS VOW SANCTIONS AGAINST CANDIDATES WHO THWART NEW CALENDAR
Sat Aug 19 2006 11:16:47 ET

The Democratic National Committee moved on Saturday to penalize 2008 presidential candidates who defied a new nominating calendar designed to lessen the longtime influence of New Hampshire and Iowa -- the two states that have traditionally kicked off the nominating process.

The NEW YORK TIMES will report on Sunday: The sanctions would be directed at candidates who campaigned in any state that refused to follow a proposed calendar that the committee was preparing to approve.

Any candidate who campaigned in a state that did not abide by the dates of the new calendar would be stripped at the party convention of any delegates won in that state.
"What? Me worry? " "whatmeworry.alfred@gmail.com"

This Was Funny (none / 0) (#5)
by Citizen McLain on Sun Aug 20, 2006 at 06:21:45 PM EST
If NH decides to move its primary to the first week of January, to uphold its own state law that a primary be held more than 7 days before or after another state's event, and a candidate wins that primary, everyone will know that those delegates belong to him or her.  

What are they going to do in August, give the NH delegates to a candidate who likely has since dropped out?

And I think they are giving preference to a state like Nevada; it's not like they are trying to strike a blow for racial diversity in the early primaries.

I can't wait for 2008.

[ Parent ]

Bush's 'Crusade' into Iraq (none / 0) (#3)
by Jim Travers on Sun Aug 20, 2006 at 11:02:37 AM EST
I predict, will be as successful as the last crusade of the middle ages.

Unfortunately for all of us, we have an idiot for a president.

Having no foreign relations experience of his own, it is he who delegated the control of our country's foreign policy, its treasury and future, to a handful of ultra-radical right wing warmongers.

So far to the right of the mainstream party they are, even the Conservatives are worried about our future economic security.

Who truly believes that Bush and his warmongers have made Americans safer, whether at home or abroad? (Or the world, for that matter?)

Our invasion to "Liberate" Iraqis by removing Hussein has been merely a thinly disguised an attempt to control that country's vast oil resources. We all know how impoverished our oil companies are!

The same is true in Afghanistan. We're there to control the oil flowing through their pipeline.(and maybe to keep the drugs flowing, too)

By bankrupting our treasury, our president has done more to harm our future security than any terrorist bombs have.

Our invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq has been the Islamic peoples 911 and has become their rallying cry to arms, to join themselves together to try and beat back America's aggressive actions, everywhere.

Look at the affect of 911 and our populace's reaction to it. We once found comfort in the protections afforded us by our constitution. It is now being dismantled, bit by bit, or ignored altogether by those in power.

The Patriot Act alone, by itself, has done more to diminish my feeling of security as an American, than any terrorist bombings occurring anywhere in my neighborhood, or anywhere else in America.

After all, Islamic fundamentalists are not that much unlike our fundamentalist Christians - each see each other as heathen blasphemers who need to be exterminated.

Change is needed if this country is to survive.

We will all be either a part of the problem or part of the solution, depending on who we vote for.

Al, did you ever stop to think how many family farms will be gobbled up by agri-biz solely because they can no longer afford fuel for their tractors?


Jim (none / 0) (#4)
by alfrednewman on Sun Aug 20, 2006 at 12:12:03 PM EST
Yes, I have thought of it.  Time to look again at bio-diesel.  When the good doctor designed his engine he had actually ran it on corn oil.

I have also read about  a guy that designed a corn fired furnace that burns corn..

"What? Me worry? " "whatmeworry.alfred@gmail.com"
[ Parent ]

Retired Vice Admiral Joe Sestak Talks Sense | 5 comments (5 topical, 0 hidden)
Display: Sort:
create account | faq | search